In silico evaluation of phycobilins as multi-target anti-tubercular scaffolds: Molecular docking, dynamic stability, ADMET and mycobacterial sensitivity analysis Scientific paper

Main Article Content

Amela Lepojević
https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2817-6284
Miroslav Jevtić
https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5672-299X
Mario Zlatović
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4311-1731
Srđan Stojanović
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1847-9318

Abstract

Tuberculosis remains a major global health burden, highlighting the urgent need for novel therapeutic scaffolds with imbproved efficacy and multi-target activity. In this study, an integrated in silico strategy was used to inves­tigate the anti-tubercular potential of four naturally occurring phycobilins – phy­cocyan­obilin, phycoerythrobilin, phycourobilin and phycoviolobilin – against a panel of essential Mycobacterium tuberculosis protein targets involved in cell wall biosyn­thesis, nucleic acid metabolism, energy production and ribosomal function. Molec­ular docking analyses revealed consistently strong binding affinities of phycobilins toward multiple targets, often exceeding those of isoniazid and approaching the binding performance of rifampicin, indicating pronounced multi-target interaction capability. Noncovalent interaction analysis showed stable and diverse interaction networks dominated by hydrogen bonding and hyd­rophobic contacts. Normal mode analysis confirmed that phycobilin binding pre­serves intrinsic protein dynamics while inducing ligand-mediated stabilization of the protein–ligand complexes, particularly for the phycoviolobilin–InhA sys­tem. Pharmacokinetic and toxicity predictions suggested moderate distribution properties and generally favorable safety profiles, although potential mutagen­icity and skin sensitization signals were identified. Additionally, mycoCSM-based predictions indicated micromolar-range anti-mycobacterial activity with limited penetration into caseous lesions. Collec­tively, these results support phycobilins as promising natural scaffolds for anti-tubercular drug discovery, warranting further optimization and experimental validation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
[1]
A. Lepojević, M. Jevtić, M. Zlatović, and S. Stojanović, “In silico evaluation of phycobilins as multi-target anti-tubercular scaffolds: Molecular docking, dynamic stability, ADMET and mycobacterial sensitivity analysis: Scientific paper”, J. Serb. Chem. Soc., vol. 91, no. 4, pp. 353–370, May 2026.
Section
Theoretical Chemistry

Funding data

References

B. D. Daniel, C. Padmapriyadarsini, S. Giri, P. S. Winarni, BMJ 390 (2025) 2024 (https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2024-080075)

M. Kufa, V. Finger, O. Kovar, O. Soukup, C. Torruellas, J. Roh, J. Korabecny, Acta Pharm. Sin., B 15 (2025) 1311 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2025.01.023)

R. R. Patel, Vidyasagar, S. K. Singh, M. Singh, Microb. Pathog. 203 (2025) 107515 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2025.107515)

A. Zumla, P. Nahid, S. T. Cole, Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 12 (2013) 388 (https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd4001)

N. Rao, V. D. Jathar, Pharm. Chem. J. 59 (2025) 512

(https://doi.org/10.1007/s11094-025-03422-z)

C. García-Gómez, D. E. Aguirre-Cavazos, A. Chávez-Montes, J. M. Ballesteros-Torres, A. A. Orozco-Flores, R. Reyna-Martínez, Á. D. Torres-Hernández, G. M. González-Meza, S. L. Castillo-Hernández, M. A. Gloria-Garza, M. Kačániová, M. Ireneusz-Kluz, J. H. Elizondo-Luevano, Mar. Drugs 23 (2025) 201 (https://doi.org/10.3390/md23050201)

I. Kolossváry, JACS Au 4 (2024) 1303 (https://doi.org/10.1021/jacsau.4c00109)

J. R. López -Blanco, J. I. Aliaga, E. S. Quintana-Orti, P. Chacón, Nucleic Acids Res. 42 (2014) W271-W276 (https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku339)

M. S. Roomi, G. Culletta, L. Longo, W. Filgueira de Azevedo, U. Perricone, M. Tutone, Pharmaceuticals 18 (2025) 1777 (https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18121777)

R. Ancuceanu, B. E. Lascu, D. Drăgănescu, M. Dinu, Pharmaceutics 17 (2025) 1002 (https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics17081002)

D. E. V. Pires, D. B. Ascher, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 60 (2020) 3450 (https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00362)

S. Kim, J. Chen, T. Cheng, A. Gindulyte, J. He, S. He, Q. Li, B. A. Shoemaker, P. A. Thiessen, B. Yu, L. Zaslavsky, J. Zhang, E. E. Bolton, Nucleic Acids Res. 51 (2023) D1373 (https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac956)

H. M. Berman, J. Westbrook, Z. Feng, G. Gilliland, T. N. Bhat, H. Weissig, I. N. Shindyalov, P. E. Bourne, Nucleic Acids Res. 28 (2000) 235 (https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/28.1.235)

Y. Liu, X. Yang, J. Gan, S. Chen, Z. X. Xiao, Y. Cao, Nucleic Acids Res. 50 (2022) W159-W164 (https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac394)

J. Eberhardt, D. Santos-Martins, A. F. Tillack, S. Forli, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 61 (2021) 3891 (https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00203)

D.S. Biovia, Discovery Studio Visualizer, San Diego, CA, 2025

X. Q. Yao, L. Skjaerven, B. J. Grant, J. Phys. Chem., B 120 (2016) 8276 (https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b01991)

Y. Myung, A. G. C. de Sá, D. B. Ascher, Nucleic Acids Res. 52 (2024) W469 (https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkae254)

B. P. Brown, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 122 (2025) e2508998122 (https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2508998122)

C. Hetényi, D. van der Spoel, Prot. Sci. 11 (2002) 1729 (https://doi.org/10.1110/ps.0202302)

S. Y. Ugurlu, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 39 (2025) 48

(https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-025-00629-w)

A. S. Mahadevi, G. N. Sastry, Chem. Rev. 116 (2016) 2775 (https://doi.org/10.1021/cr500344e)

L. W. Yang, E. Eyal, C. Chennubhotla, J. Jee, A. M. Gronenborn, I. Bahar, Structure 15 (2007) 741 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2007.04.014)

T. Ichiye, M. Karplus, Proteins 11 (1991) 205 (https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.340110305)

F. Tama, Y. H. Sanejouand, Protein Eng. 14 (2001) 1 (https://doi.org/10.1093/protein/14.1.1)

I. Bahar, T. R. Lezon, L. W. Yang, E. Eyal, Ann. Rev. Biophys. 39 (2010) 23 (https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biophys.093008.131258)

H. van de Waterbeemd, E. Gifford, Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2 (2003) 192 (https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd1032)

U. M. Zanger, M. Schwab, Pharmacol. Ther. 138 (2013) 103 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2012.12.007)

World Health Organization, WHO consolidated guidelines on tuberculosis: Module 4 – Treatment, World Health Organization, Geneva, 2023 (https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240107243)

R. Benigni, C. Bossa, Chem. Rev. 111 (2011) 2507 (https://doi.org/10.1021/cr100222q)

P. Y. Muller, M. N. Milton, Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 63 (2012) 388 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2012.05.003)

B. Prideaux, L. E. Via, M. D. Zimmerman, S. Eum, J. Sarathy, P. O'Brien, C. Chen, F. Kaya, D. M. Weiner, P. Y. Chen, T. Song, M. Lee, T. S. Shim, J. S. Cho, W. Kim, S. N. Cho, K. N. Olivier, C. E. Barry, III, V. Dartois, Nat. Med. 21 (2015) 1223 (https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3937)

T. Bourguignon, JA. Godinez-Leon, R. Gref, Pharmaceutics 15 (2023) 393 (https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15020393)

A. Sharma, V. Sharma, S. Sharma, S. Sharma, M. Sharma, I. Sivanesan, Pharmaceutics 17 (2025) 1459 (https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics17111459)

V. Dartois, Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 12 (2014) 159 (https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3200)

R. Zhang, H. Wen, Z. Lin, B. Li, X. Zhou, Toxics 13 (2025) 525 (https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13070525).

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>