Antioxidative response of tomato genotypes to late blight infection
Main Article Content
Abstract
Wild species are widely used as potential sources of resistance of tomato to late blight (LB) (causal agent Phytophthora infestans). The biochemical response of wild and cultivated tomato genotypes with different levels of resistance to P. infestans was assessed through the total phenolic and flavonoid content and antioxidative capacity. In total, six genotypes were included in the research – three cultivated tomato varieties and three wild species. The wild genotypes Solanum pimpinellifolium S 220 and Solanum habrochaites had a significantly lower infection rate compared to the other tested genotypes. After disease assessment on the leaves, biochemical analyses were performed. Grouping of the wild accessions according to principal component analysis (PCA) analysis indicated similar reaction to LB infection. Furthermore, late blight trait is closer to cultivated genotypes. Although the phenolics and flavonoids have high importance in the reaction of tomato plants to late blight infection, these traits are not closely related to wild species and the disease. According to this study, the antioxidative tests that indicate a response of wild species to late blight infection are total antioxidant activity (TAA), ferric-reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) and radical cation scavenging activity (ABTS).
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
J. Zdravković, Ž. Marković, M. Zdravković, M. Mijatović, N. Pavlović, Genetika 44 (2012) 701 (http://doi:10.2298/GENSR1203701Z)
M. Nowicki, E. Kozik, M. R. Foolad, in Translational genomics for crop breeding, R. Varshney, R. Tuberosa, Eds., Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2013, p. 484
E. Ohlson, M. Foolad, Plant Breed. 134 (2015) 461 (https://doi.org/10.1111/pbr.12273)
A. Drenth, M. Janssen, F. Govers, 1995. Plant Path. 44 (1995):86 (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.1995.tb02719.x)
D. Panthee, F. Chen, Curr. Genomics 11 (2010) 30 (https://doi:10.2174/138920210790217927)
S. Medić-Pap, D. Danojević, A. Takač, S. Maširević, J. Červenski, V. Popović, Ratar. Povrt. 54 (2017) 87 (https://doi:10.5937/ratpov54-12966)
M. Nowicki, M. Foolad, M. Nowakowska, E. Kozik, Plant Dis. 96 (2012) 4 (https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-05-11-0458)
U. Gisi, F. Walder, Z. Resheat-Eini, D. Edel, H. Sierotzki, J. Phytopath. 159 (2011) 223 (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0434.2010.01753.x)
V. Lattanzio, V. M. Lattanzio, A. Cardinali, in Phytochemistry Advances in Research, F. Imperato, Ed., Research Signpost, Kerala, 2006, p. 23
S. Mandal, A Mitra, N. Mallick, Physiol. Mol. Plant. Pathol. 72 (2008) 56 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmpp.2008.04.002)
F. Helepciuc, M. Mitoi, A. Manole-Păunescua, F. Aldea, A. Brezeanua, C. Cornea, Rom. Biotech. Lett. 19 (2014) 9366 (https://e-repository.org/rbl/vol.19/iss.3/9.pdf)
M. Racchi, Antioxidants 2 (2013) 340 (https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox2040340)
J. Oszmiański, J. Kolniak-Ostek, A. Biernat, Molecules 20 (2015) 2176 (https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules20022176)
J. Mierziak, K. Kostyn, A. Kulma, Molecules 19 (2014) 16240 (https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules191016240)
B. Skadhauge, K. Thomsen, D. von Wettstein, Hereditas 126 (1997) 147 (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1601-5223.1997.00147.x)
G. Dai, M. Nicole, C. Andary, C. Martinez, E. Bresson, B. Boher, J. Daniel, J. Geiger, Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 49 (1996) 285 (https://doi.org/10.1006/pmpp.1996.0055)
EPPO/OEPP, Standards: Efficacy evaluation of fungicides, PP 1/65 (3), 2013
V. Nagavani, T. Raghava Rao, Adv. Biol. Res. 4 (2010) 159 (https://www.idosijournals.org/abr/4(3)/3.pdf)
A. Saha, R. Rahman, M. Shahriar, S. Saha, N. Al Azad, S. Das, J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2 (2013) 181 (https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/692d/95dd7807109584404b9b2baa494ecb16222f.pdf)
H. Y. Lai, Y. Y. Lim, IJESD 2 (2011) 442 (http://:doi:10.7763/IJESD.2011.V2.166)
P. Valentão, E. Fernandes, F. Carvalho, P. Andrade, R. Seabra, M. Bastos, J. Agric. Food Chem. 50 (2002) 4989 (https://:doi:10.1021/jf020225o)
N. Miller, C. Rice-Evans, M. Davies, V. Gopinathan, A. Milner, Clin. Sci. 84 (1993) 407 (https://doi.org/10.1042/cs0840407)
M. Kalaskar, S. Surana, J. Chil. Chem. Soc. 59 (2014) 2299 (https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-97072014000100012)
M. Fooland, H. Merk, H. Ashrafi, CRC Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 27 (2008) 75 (https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680802147353)
M. Nowakowska, M. Nowicki, U. Kłosinska, R. Maciorowski, E. Kozik, PLoS One 9 (2014) e109328. (http://:doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0109328)
M. Kim, M. Mutschler, Tomato Genetics Cooperative Report 540 (2000) 23 (https://tgc.ifas.ufl.edu/vol50/Volume50.pdf)
M. Fooland, M. Sullenberger, E. Ohlson, B. Gugino, Plant Breed. 133 (2014) 401 (https://doi.org/10.1111/pbr.12172)
K. Akhtar, M. Saleem, Q. Iqbal, M. Asghar, A. Hameed, N. Sarwar, J. Plant Pathol. 98 (2016) 421 (https://dx.doi.org/10.4454/JPP.V98I3.002)
S. Medić-Pap, D. Prvulović, A. Takač, S. Vlajić, D. Danojević, A. Takač, S. Maširević, Genetika 47 (2015) 1099 (https://:doi:10.2298/GENSR1503099M)
S. Kumar, A. Panday, Sci. World J. (2013) Article ID 162750 (https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/162750)
V. Čeksterytė, B. Kurtinaitienė, P. Rimantas Venskutonis, A. Pukalskas, R. Kazernavičiūtė, J. Balžekas, Czech. J. Food Sci. 34 (2016) 133 (https://doi.org/10.17221/312/2015-CJFS)
S. B. Nimse, D. Pal, RSC Adv. 5 (2015) 27986 (https://10.1039/C4RA13315C)
D. Kasote, S. Katyare, M. Hegde, H. Bae, Int. J. Biol. Sci. 11 (2015) 982 (http://:doi: 10.7150/ijbs.12096)
N. T. Keen, Adv. Bot. Res. 30 (1999) 291 (https://:doi:10.1016/S0065-2296(08)60230-X)
A. Widmark, PhD Thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, 2010, p. 67
K. Yao, V. De Luca, N. Brisson, Plant Cell 7 (1995) 1787 (https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.7.11.1787)
R. Hückelhoven, Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 45 (2007) 101 (https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.45.062806.094325)
E. Miedes, R. Vanholme, W. Boerjan, A. Molina, Front. Plant Sci. 5 (2014) 358 (https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00358)
K. Kulbat, Biotech. Food Sci. 80 (2016) 97 (https://repozytorium.p.lodz.pl/bitstream/handle/11652/1613/Role_phenolic_compounds_Kulbat_2016.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y)
E. Kużniak, M. Skłodowska, Planta 222 (2005) 192 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-005-1514-8)
M. Henriquez, L. Adam, F. Daayf, Plant Physiol. Biochem. 57 (2012) 8 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.04.013)
V. Vleeshouwers, W. van Dooijeweert, F. Govers, S. Kamoun, L. Colon, Planta 210 (2000) 853 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s004250050690)
A. Hardham, L. Blackman, Australas. Plant Path. 39 (2010) 29 (https://doi.org/10.1071/AP09062).