University students’ scientific knowledge levels regarding chemical reaction arrows and electron arrows Scientific paper
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study investigated undergraduate students’ recognition of chem-ical reaction arrows and electron arrows and their understanding of their func-tions. The research was conducted using a comparative research design. A four-tier diagnostic test for chemical reaction arrows and electron arrows was devel-oped. 181 university students participated in the test development phase. The dif-ficulty and discrimination indices of the test items were calculated. The reliability coefficient of the test was found to be 0.76. The four-tier diagnostic test was then administered to 174 university students to determine whether the participants’ levels of scientific knowledge of chemical reaction arrows and electron arrows differed by gender, department and grade levels. The results showed that the university students had an inadequate level of scientific knowledge about chemical reaction arrows and electron arrows. It was found that more than half of the university students were deficient in all questions. It was also found that the level of scientific knowledge of the participants did not differ according to gender, but did differ according to grade level and department. These differences were in favour of fourth year students and against electrical and electronics engineering students.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Funding data
-
Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu
Grant numbers 1919B012214484
References
A. Lakshminarayanan, Resonance 15 (2010) 51 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s12045-010-0006-8)
E. R. Lujan-Martinez, J. Ind. Celtic Stud. 6 (2006) 715 (https://dc.uwm.edu/ekeltoi/vol6/iss1/16)
H. M. Leicester, Panorama historico de la quamica, Alhambra, Madrid, 1967
A. Lavoisier, Traite elementaire de Chimie, Cuchet, Paris, 1 (1789)
Nobel Lectures, Chemistry, 1901–1921, Elsevier Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1966
H. Marshall, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin. 24 (1902) 85 (https://doi.org/10.1017/S0370164600007720)
G. Bhattacharyya, G. Bodner, J. Chem. Educ. 82 (2005) 1402 (https://doi.org/10.1021/ed082p1402)
S. Alvarez, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51 (2012) 590 (https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201101767)
W. N. Turek, J. Chem. Educ. 69 (1992) 45 (https://doi.org/10.1021/ed069p45)
M. S. Carle, R. Visser, A. B. Flynn, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 21 (2020) 582 (https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RP00274J)
S. Berg, A. Ghosh, J. Chem. Educ. 88 (2011) 1663 (https://doi.org/10.1021/ed200166z)
A. R. Straumanis, S. M. Ruder, J. Chem. Educ. 86 (2009) 1389 (https://doi.org/10.1021/ed086p1389)
S. M. Ruder, A. R. Straumanis, J. Chem. Educ. 86 (2009) 1392 (https://doi.org/10.1021/ed086p1392)
R. Ferguson, G.M. Bodner, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 9 (2008) 102 (https://doi.org/10.1039/B806225K)
D. A. Falvo, J.P. Suits, J. Educ. Comp. Res. 41 (2009) 83 (https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.41.1.d)
Y. Kurata, M.J. Egenhofer, Spat. Cogn. Comp. 8 (2008) 306 (https://doi.org/10.1080/13875860802148843)
A. Ayas, A. Demirbaş, J. Chem. Educ. 74 (1997) 518 (https://doi.org/10.1021/ed074p518)
J. Gilbert, D. Treagust, Multiple Representations in Chemical Education. Models and Modelling, 4, Springer, Amsterdam, 2009
K. S. Taber, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 14 (2013) 156 (https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RP00012E)
A. H. Johnstone, J. Comp. Ass. Learn. 7 (1991) 75 (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.1991.tb00230.x)
B. Demirdöğen, F. Nur-Akın, G. Demircan-Akman, YYU J. Educ. Fac. 18 (2021) 524 (https://doi.org/10.33711/yyuefd.1029070)
D.L. Gabel, Handbook on science teaching and learning: A project of the
National Science Teacher Association, Macmillan, New York, 2005
A.H. Johnstone, J. Chem. Educ. 70 (1993) 701 (https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/ed070p701)
B. Ekiz-Kıran, E. S. Kutucu, A. Tarkın-Çelikkıran, M. Tüysüz, YYU J. Educ. Fac. 15 (2018) 1081 (https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/594855)
N. Karasar, Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi, Ankara, Nobel, 2005
J. H. McMillan, S. Schumacher, Research in Education: Evidence-Based Inquiry, 7th ed., Pearson, Boston, MA, 2001
D. Kaltakçı, Unpublished PhD Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara
I. Caleon, R. Subramaniam, Int. J. Sci. Educ. 32 (2010) 939 (https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902890130)
F.Ö. Karataş, S. Köse, B. Coştu, Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 1 (2003) 54 (https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/114820)
S. Bayrakçeken, in Test Geliştirme, E. Karip, Ed., Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Pegem A, Ankara, 2015, pp. 244–277
S.A. Kiray, S. Şimsek, Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ. 19 (2021) 935 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10087-5)
T. Taban, S.A. Kiray, Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ. 20 (2022) 1791 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10224-8)
S. Hasan, D. Bagayoko, E.L. Kelley, Physics Educ. 34 (1999) 294 (https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/34/5/304)
E. Taslidere, Res. Sci. Tech. Educ. 34 (2016) 164 (https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2015.1124409)
A. Eryilmaz, Eurasian J. Educ. Res. 40 (2010) 53 (https://ejer.com.tr/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/ejer_2010_issue_40.pdf)
G.A. Morgan, N.L. Leech, G.W. Gloeckner, K.C. Barret, SPSS for Introductory Statistics: Use and Interpretation (2nd ed.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London, 2004
H. Tekin, Eğitimde Ölçme ve Değerlendirme, 20th ed., Yargı Yayınevi, Ankara, 2010
Ş. Büyüköztürk, Sosyal Bilimler için Veri Analizi El Kitabı, 28th ed., Pegem Yayınevi, Ankara, 2020
D. Hestenes, I. Halloun, Interpreting The Force Concept Inventory: A Response, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287-
-1504, 1995
M. Wu, P. Tian, D. Sun, D. Feng, M. Luo, Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ. 23 (2024) 907 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10494-y).
K. B. Putica, J. Chem. Educ. 101 (2024) 1442 (https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c01343)
B. Sreenivasulu, R. Subramaniam, Res. Sci. Educ. 44 (2014) 801 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9400-7)
N. Ali, S. Ullah, D. Khan, Educ. Inf. Tech. 27 (2022) 7629 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10936-6)
A.B. Flynn, R.B. Featherstone, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 18 (2017) 64 (https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RP00126B)
G. M. Bodner, D. S. Domin, Univ. Chem. Educ. 4 (2000) 24 (https://edu.rsc.org/download?ac=517097).