University students’ scientific knowledge levels regarding chemical reaction arrows and electron arrows Scientific paper

Main Article Content

Gökçe Özveren
https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6339-5699
Betül Turan
https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6422-8963
Melike Ulucan
https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1303-3919
Cemal Tosun
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1236-9548

Abstract

This study investigated undergraduate students’ recognition of chem-ical reaction arrows and electron arrows and their understanding of their func-tions. The research was conducted using a comparative research design. A four-tier diagnostic test for chemical reaction arrows and electron arrows was devel-oped. 181 university students participated in the test development phase. The dif-ficulty and discrimination indices of the test items were calculated. The reliability coefficient of the test was found to be 0.76. The four-tier diagnostic test was then administered to 174 university students to determine whether the participants’ levels of scientific knowledge of chemical reaction arrows and electron arrows differed by gender, department and grade levels. The results showed that the university students had an inadequate level of scientific know­ledge about chemical reaction arrows and electron arrows. It was found that more than half of the university students were deficient in all questions. It was also found that the level of scientific knowledge of the participants did not differ according to gender, but did differ according to grade level and department. These differences were in favour of fourth year students and against electrical and electronics engineering students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
[1]
G. Özveren, B. Turan, M. Ulucan, and C. Tosun, “University students’ scientific knowledge levels regarding chemical reaction arrows and electron arrows: Scientific paper”, J. Serb. Chem. Soc., vol. 90, no. 10, pp. 1267–1284, Nov. 2025.
Section
History of & Education in Chemistry

Funding data

References

A. Lakshminarayanan, Resonance 15 (2010) 51 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s12045-010-0006-8)

E. R. Lujan-Martinez, J. Ind. Celtic Stud. 6 (2006) 715 (https://dc.uwm.edu/ekeltoi/vol6/iss1/16)

H. M. Leicester, Panorama historico de la quamica, Alhambra, Madrid, 1967

A. Lavoisier, Traite elementaire de Chimie, Cuchet, Paris, 1 (1789)

Nobel Lectures, Chemistry, 1901–1921, Elsevier Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1966

H. Marshall, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin. 24 (1902) 85 (https://doi.org/10.1017/S0370164600007720)

G. Bhattacharyya, G. Bodner, J. Chem. Educ. 82 (2005) 1402 (https://doi.org/10.1021/ed082p1402)

S. Alvarez, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51 (2012) 590 (https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201101767)

W. N. Turek, J. Chem. Educ. 69 (1992) 45 (https://doi.org/10.1021/ed069p45)

M. S. Carle, R. Visser, A. B. Flynn, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 21 (2020) 582 (https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RP00274J)

S. Berg, A. Ghosh, J. Chem. Educ. 88 (2011) 1663 (https://doi.org/10.1021/ed200166z)

A. R. Straumanis, S. M. Ruder, J. Chem. Educ. 86 (2009) 1389 (https://doi.org/10.1021/ed086p1389)

S. M. Ruder, A. R. Straumanis, J. Chem. Educ. 86 (2009) 1392 (https://doi.org/10.1021/ed086p1392)

R. Ferguson, G.M. Bodner, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 9 (2008) 102 (https://doi.org/10.1039/B806225K)

D. A. Falvo, J.P. Suits, J. Educ. Comp. Res. 41 (2009) 83 (https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.41.1.d)

Y. Kurata, M.J. Egenhofer, Spat. Cogn. Comp. 8 (2008) 306 (https://doi.org/10.1080/13875860802148843)

A. Ayas, A. Demirbaş, J. Chem. Educ. 74 (1997) 518 (https://doi.org/10.1021/ed074p518)

J. Gilbert, D. Treagust, Multiple Representations in Chemical Education. Models and Modelling, 4, Springer, Amsterdam, 2009

K. S. Taber, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 14 (2013) 156 (https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RP00012E)

A. H. Johnstone, J. Comp. Ass. Learn. 7 (1991) 75 (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.1991.tb00230.x)

B. Demirdöğen, F. Nur-Akın, G. Demircan-Akman, YYU J. Educ. Fac. 18 (2021) 524 (https://doi.org/10.33711/yyuefd.1029070)

D.L. Gabel, Handbook on science teaching and learning: A project of the

National Science Teacher Association, Macmillan, New York, 2005

A.H. Johnstone, J. Chem. Educ. 70 (1993) 701 (https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/ed070p701)

B. Ekiz-Kıran, E. S. Kutucu, A. Tarkın-Çelikkıran, M. Tüysüz, YYU J. Educ. Fac. 15 (2018) 1081 (https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/594855)

N. Karasar, Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi, Ankara, Nobel, 2005

J. H. McMillan, S. Schumacher, Research in Education: Evidence-Based Inquiry, 7th ed., Pearson, Boston, MA, 2001

D. Kaltakçı, Unpublished PhD Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara

I. Caleon, R. Subramaniam, Int. J. Sci. Educ. 32 (2010) 939 (https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902890130)

F.Ö. Karataş, S. Köse, B. Coştu, Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 1 (2003) 54 (https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/114820)

S. Bayrakçeken, in Test Geliştirme, E. Karip, Ed., Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Pegem A, Ankara, 2015, pp. 244–277

S.A. Kiray, S. Şimsek, Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ. 19 (2021) 935 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10087-5)

T. Taban, S.A. Kiray, Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ. 20 (2022) 1791 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10224-8)

S. Hasan, D. Bagayoko, E.L. Kelley, Physics Educ. 34 (1999) 294 (https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/34/5/304)

E. Taslidere, Res. Sci. Tech. Educ. 34 (2016) 164 (https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2015.1124409)

A. Eryilmaz, Eurasian J. Educ. Res. 40 (2010) 53 (https://ejer.com.tr/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/ejer_2010_issue_40.pdf)

G.A. Morgan, N.L. Leech, G.W. Gloeckner, K.C. Barret, SPSS for Introductory Statistics: Use and Interpretation (2nd ed.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London, 2004

H. Tekin, Eğitimde Ölçme ve Değerlendirme, 20th ed., Yargı Yayınevi, Ankara, 2010

Ş. Büyüköztürk, Sosyal Bilimler için Veri Analizi El Kitabı, 28th ed., Pegem Yayınevi, Ankara, 2020

D. Hestenes, I. Halloun, Interpreting The Force Concept Inventory: A Response, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287-

-1504, 1995

M. Wu, P. Tian, D. Sun, D. Feng, M. Luo, Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ. 23 (2024) 907 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10494-y).

K. B. Putica, J. Chem. Educ. 101 (2024) 1442 (https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c01343)

B. Sreenivasulu, R. Subramaniam, Res. Sci. Educ. 44 (2014) 801 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9400-7)

N. Ali, S. Ullah, D. Khan, Educ. Inf. Tech. 27 (2022) 7629 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10936-6)

A.B. Flynn, R.B. Featherstone, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 18 (2017) 64 (https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RP00126B)

G. M. Bodner, D. S. Domin, Univ. Chem. Educ. 4 (2000) 24 (https://edu.rsc.org/download?ac=517097).