Removal of Fe2+, Zn2+ and Mn2+ from the mining wastewater by lemon peel waste

Article Sidebar

PDF (2,072 kB) Supplementary Material (1.90 MB)
Published: Oct 30, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/JSC200413030M
Keywords:
sorption citrus peel biosorbent wastewater

Main Article Content

Slađana Meseldžija
Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, Mike Petrovića-Alasa 12-14, Belgrade, Serbia
Jelena Petrović
Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, Mike Petrovića-Alasa 12-14, Belgrade, Serbia
Antonije Onjia
Faculty of Technology and Metallurgy, Karnegijeva 4, Belgrade, Serbia
Tatjana Volkov-Husović
Faculty of Technology and Metallurgy, Karnegijeva 4, Belgrade, Serbia
Aleksandra Nešić
Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, Mike Petrovića-Alasa 12-14, Belgrade, Serbia
Nikola Vukelić
Faculty for Physical Chemistry, Studentski trg 12-16, Belgrade, Serbia

Abstract

This study is aimed to evaluate the possibility of lemon peel, as an agro-industrial waste, to remove Fe2+, Zn2+ and Mn2+ from single aqueous sol­u­ti­ons and mining wastewater. For this purpose, the influence of various para­me­ters: sorption time, initial pH solution, initial metal ion concentration and a dose of sorbent on the sorption process were studied in batch experiments. The experi­mental equilibrium data have been analysed utilizing linearized forms of Lang­muir, Freundlich, Temkin and Dubinin–Radushkevich isotherms. The Langmuir isotherm provided the best theoretical correlation of the experi­men­tal equilibrium data for Fe2+, Zn2+ and Mn2+, with the maximum sorption cap­acities of 4.40, 5.03 and 4.52 mg g-1, respectively.  The percentage of targeted ions removal from single aqueous solutions was 92.9 % (Zn2+), 84.5 % (Fe2+) and 78.2 % (Mn2+). Regarding the sorption capability of lemon peel in mining wastewater, the maxi­mum removal of Fe2+, Zn2+ and Mn2+ from mining waste­water was 49.62, 33.97 and 9.11 %, respectively. In addition, the potential reusability of the lemon peel as sorbent was investigated through desorption study in 0.1M of CH3COO4, HCl and HNO3 solution. The highest rate of desorption was achieved in 0.1 M HCl solution, reached a value of 55.19 % for Mn2+ and 37.24 % for Zn2+, while for Fe2+ the highest value of 25.82 % was achieved in 0.1M HNO3 solution.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
[1]
S. Meseldžija, J. Petrović, A. Onjia, T. Volkov-Husović, A. Nešić, and N. Vukelić, “Removal of Fe2+, Zn2+ and Mn2+ from the mining wastewater by lemon peel waste”, J. Serb. Chem. Soc., vol. 85, no. 10, pp. 1371–1382, Oct. 2020.
Issue
Vol. 85 No. 10 (2020)
Section
Environmental Chemistry

Creative Commons лиценца
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Read more....

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

E. Malkoc, J. Hazard. Mater. 137 (2006) 899 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.03.004)

S. E. Bailey, T. J. Olin, R. M. Bricka, D. D. Adrian, Water Res. 33 (1999) 2469 (https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00475-8)

U. Kumar, Sci. Res. Essay 1 (2006) 33 (https://doi.org/10.5958/j.0974-4487.11.1.001)

T. Ahmad, M. Danish, J. Environ. Manage. 206 (2018) 330 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.10.061)

Š. Abdić, M. Memić, E. Šabanović, J. Sulejmanović, S. Begić, Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 15 (2018) 2511 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1645-7)

A. Bhatnagar, M. Sillanpää, A. Witek-Krowiak, Chem. Eng. J. 270 (2015) 244 (https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEJ.2015.01.135)

C. K. Jain, D. S. Malik, A. K. Yadav, Environ. Process. (2016) 495 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-016-0143-5)

D. A. Zema, P. S. Calabrò, A. Folino, V. Tamburino, G. Zappia, S. M. Zimbone, Waste Manage. 80 (2018) 252 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.09.024)

M. E. Magare, N. Sahu, G. S. Kanade, C. S. Chanotiya, S. T. Thul, Waste Biomass Valorization 11 (2020) 165 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-018-0385-8)

D. Mamma, P. Christakopoulos, Waste Biomass Valorization 5 (2013) 529 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-013-9250-y)

Y. N. Mata, M. L. Blázquez, A. Ballester, F. González, J. A. Muñoz, Chem. Eng. J. 150 (2009) 289 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.01.001)

E. F. Lessa, A. L. Medina, A. S. Ribeiro, A. R. Fajardo, Arab. J. Chem. 13 (2020) 709 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2017.07.011)

S. Meseldzija, J. Petrovic, A. Onjia, T. Volkov-Husovic, A. Nesic, N. Vukelic, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 75 (2019) (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2019.03.031)

APHA Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 17th ed., American Public Health Association, Washington DC, 1989

S. S. Nielsen, Food Analysis Laboratory Manual, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2017 (https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44127-6)

H. P. Boehm, Carbon N. Y. 32 (1994) 759 (https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(94)90031-0)

S. L. Goertzen, K. D. Thériault, A. M. Oickle, A. C. Tarasuk, H. A. Andreas, Carbon N. Y. 48 (2010) 1252 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2009.11.050)

M. Masmoudi, S. Besbes, M. Chaabouni, C. Robert, Carbohydr. Polym. 74 (2008) 185 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.02.003)

X. Li, Y. Tang, X. Cao, D. Lu, F. Luo, W. Shao, Colloids Surfaces, A 317 (2008) 512 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2007.11.031)

T. Bohli, I. Villaescusa, A. Ouedern, J. Chem. Eng. Process Technol. 04 (2013) (https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7048.1000158)

K. Anitha, R. J. Rinu Isah, Int. J. Pure Appl. Math. 116 (2017) 91 (https://acadpubl.eu/jsi/2017-116-13-22/articles/13/16.pdf)

E. Bernard, A. Jimoh, Int. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 4 (2013) 95 (http://eaas-journal.org/survey/userfiles/files/v4i212%20chemical%20engineering(1).pdf)

K. M. Al-Qahtani, J. Taibah Univ. Sci. 10 (2016) 700 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtusci.2015.09.001)

M. Ngabura, S. A. Hussain, W. A. W. A. Ghani, M. S. Jami, Y. P. Tan, J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 6 (2018) 2528 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2018.03.052)

S. L. Shrestha, Int. J. Appl. Sci. Biotechnol. 6 (2018) 137 (https://doi.org/10.3126/ijasbt.v6i2.20423)

M. R. Moghadam, N. Nasirizadeh, Z. Dashti, E. Babanezhad, Int. J. Ind. Chem. 4 (2013) 19 (https://doi.org/10.1186/2228-5547-4-19)

A. Ali, Environ. Nanotechnology, Monit. Manage. 7 (2017) 57 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enmm.2016.12.004)

M. Celus, C. Kyomugasho, Z. J. Kermani, K. Roggen, A. M. Van Loey, T. Grauwet, M. E. Hendrickx, Food Hydrocoll. 73 (2017) 101 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2017.06.021)

J. N. BeMiller, in Chem. Funct. Pectins, American Chemical Society, Washington DC, 1986, pp. 2–12 (https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-1986-0310.ch001)

M. Y. Khotimchenko, E. A. Kolenchenko, Y. S. Khotimchenko, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 323 (2008) 216 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2008.04.013)

K. Biswas, S. K. Saha, U. C. Ghosh, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 46 (2007) 5346 (https://doi.org/10.1021/ie061401b)

M. P. Tavlieva, S. D. Genieva, V. G. Georgieva, L. T. Vlaev, J. Mol. Liq. 211 (2015) 938 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2015.08.015)

Y. Zhang, J. Zhao, Z. Jiang, D. Shan, Y. Lu, Biomed Res. Int. 2014 (2014) 1 (https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/973095)

A. Ali, K. Saeed, Desalin. Water Treat. (2014) 37 (https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2013.876669)

C. Wu, C. Kuo, S. Guan, Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 24 (2015) 761 (https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/31222)

G. Annadurai, R. S. Juang, D. J. Lee, Water Sci. Technol. 47 (2003) 185 (https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2003.0049)

P. A. Milani, K. B. Debs, G. Labuto, E. N. V. M. Carrilho, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 25 (2018) 35895 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1615-0).

Most read articles by the same author(s)