The effects of online learning about the Brønsted-Lowry theory of acids and bases in the first grade of grammar school during the COVID-19 pandemic Scientific paper

Main Article Content

Ana-Andrea Holik
https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8448-4643
Dragica Trivić
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8511-4354

Abstract

The aim of this paper was to examine the effects of the application of online material on the Brønsted-Lowry theory of acids and bases on the active construction of knowledge in first-grade grammar school students during the COVID-19 pandemic. The online material was designed to enable students: (a) to learn the teaching material in smaller parts; (b) to assess the acquired knowledge after each part of the teaching material; (c) to progress through the lesson at their own pace; (d) to visualise and interrelate the macroscopic, submicroscopic and symbolic representations of the contents about acids and bases by using a video recording and illustrations; (e) to re-examine the accuracy of the given answers. The research sample consisted of 122 first-grade grammar school students, who learnt about the Brønsted-Lowry theory for the first time. The instruments used in this research study were two tests (a pre-test and a post-test), the validity of which was examined by two university professors and two grammar school chemistry teachers. The applied approach enabled the active construction of knowledge in the majority of students, while it provided the teachers with an insight into the progress and outcomes of the process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
[1]
A.-A. Holik and D. . Trivić, “The effects of online learning about the Brønsted-Lowry theory of acids and bases in the first grade of grammar school during the COVID-19 pandemic: Scientific paper”, J. Serb. Chem. Soc., vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 275–289, Mar. 2024.
Section
History of & Education in Chemistry

Funding data

References

A. Pardino, I. Gleyzer, I. Javed, J. Reid-Hector, A. Heuer, Creat. Educ. 9 (2018) 1123 (https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2018.97083)

T. Russell, The No Significant Difference Phenomenon: As reported in 355 research reports, summaries, and papers, 5th edn. IDECC, North Carolina State University, 2001

C. Cavanaugh, K. J. Gillan, J. Kromrey, M. Hess, R. Blomeyer, The effects of distance education on K-12 student outcomes: a meta-analysis. Learning Point Associates/North Central Regional Educational Laboratory, 2004

N. Jahng, D. H. Krug, Z. Zhang, The European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning 10 (2007) (https://old.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2007/Jahng_Krug_Zhang.pdf)

M. Allen, J. Bourhis, N. Burrell, E. Mabry, Am. J. Distance Educ. 16 (2002) 83 (https://doi.org/10.1207/S15389286AJDE1602_3)

A. Driscoll, K. Jicha, A. N. Hunt, L. Tichavsky, G. Thompson, Teach. Sociol. 40 (2012) 312 (https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X12446624)

Y. Zhao, J. Lei, B. Y. C. Lai, H. S. Tan, Teach. Coll. Rec. 107 (2005) 1836 (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2005.00544.x)

M. Shachar, Y. Neumann, Int. Rev. Res. in Open Dis. Learn. 4 (2003) 1 (https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v4i2.153)

M. Allen, E. Mabry, M. Mattrey, J. Bourhis, S. Titsworth, N. Burrell, J. Commun. 54 (2004) 402 (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02636.x)

R. A. Tigaa, S. L. Sonawane, J. Chem. Educ. 97 (2020) 3318 (https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00554)

S. S. Jaggars, Am. J. Distance Educ. 28 (2014) 27 (https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2014.867697)

I. J. Rhile, J. Chem. Educ. 97 (2020) 2857 (https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00618)

S. L. Williams, Am. J. Distance Educ. 20 (2006) 127 (https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde2003_2)

R. M. Bernard, P. C. Abrami, Y. Lou, E. Borokhovski, A. Wade, L. Wozney, P. A. Wallet, M. Fiset, B. Huang, Rev. Educ. Res. 74 (2004) 379 (https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074003379)

K. Swan, Learning effectiveness: what the research tells us, in J. Bourne, J. C. Moore (Eds) Elements of Quality Online Education, Practice and Direction. Needham, MA: Sloan Center for Online Education, 2003, pp.13-45

J. G. Nguyen, K. J. Keuseman, J. J. Humston, J. Chem. Educ. 97 (2020) 3429 (https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00790)

H. T. Nennig, K. L. Idárraga, L. D. Salzer, A. Bleske-Rechek, R. M. Theisen, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 21 (2020) 168 (https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RP00112C)

Z. Qiang, A. G. Obando, Y. Chen, C. Ye, J. Chem. Educ. 97 (2020) 3446 (https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00609)

E. K. Faulconer, J. C. Griffith, B. L. Wood, S. Acharyya, D. L. Roberts, Chem. Educ. Res. Prac. 19 (2018) 392 (https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RP00173H)

J. F. Eichler, J. Peeples, J. Chem. Educ. 90 (2013) 1137. (https://doi.org/10.1021/ed3006264)

D. Šišović, S. Bojović, Nastava i vaspitanje. 50 (2001) 185 (https://scindeks.ceon.rs/article.aspx?artid=0547-33300102185S)

S. H. Paik, J. Chem. Educ. 92 (2015) 1484 (https://doi.org/10.1021/ed500891w).